In order to try and sort out the issue of the provision of pedestrian crossings, I asked another formal question of WC.
The answer is below and would seem to show that the provision of the two pedestrian crossings was an addition made 'on the night' and not part of the formal officer recommendation.
'Dear Councillor Clark,
In response to your question regarding the discussion at Committee of condition 10 on the Hilperton Relief Road.
Condition 10, as agreed by the meeting (minute 294 refers) reads as follows:
Amendment of condition 10 to read as follows: -
Notwithstanding the details shown on the submitted drawings, no development shall take place until details of the pedestrian crossings where footways and footpaths cross the road, and details of the pedestrian and bridleway crossing at Middle Lane have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. Zebra crossings will be provided on the new road adjacent to the “Fieldways” roundabout and to the “Wyke Road” roundabout. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details before the road is opened to traffic. Kissing gates suitable for disabled use shall be provided where footpaths intersect the road.
REASON: In the interests of highway safety, in order to safeguard amenity, and to facilitate access for all.
Condition 10, as recommended by the officer reads as follows:
Notwithstanding the details shown on the submitted drawings no development shall take place until details of the pedestrian crossings where footpaths cross the road, and details of the pedestrian and bridleway crossing at Middle Lane have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and the crossings shall be complete and operational before the road is opened to traffic.
REASON: In order to safeguard amenity.'