Shouldn't their documents be factually correct?
The link below should assist you if you gave up trying to find anything about the Trowbridge/Hilperton area in the recently published document.
It’s ‘only’ 119 pages….
I’m sure you will all read it (!) but section 5.23 is ‘interesting’ whilst p.74 (297 site overview), p.75 (263 site overview), and p.77 (293 site overview) state that these sites are in Trowbridge!! Whether this is a genuine mistake or the start of a misinformation campaign, I don’t know!!
Happy reading.